IMPLIKASI PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD TERHADAP SISTEM KEPARTAIAN DI INDONESIA

  • Okta Yuda Adiwira Universitas Kader Bangsa
Keywords: Parliamentary Threshold, political parties, Indonesian political system

Abstract

The main topic of discussion in this journal is the application of the parliamentary threshold policy in the political system in Indonesia. The Parliamentary threshold is a minimum vote acquisition threshold that must be met by political parties participating in the elections to be able to place their legislative candidates in parliament. The juridical empirical research method is used for discussion, which includes the effectiveness and impact of the law. This study also aims to provide input or contribution of ideas to the central government in implementing the parliamentary threshold policy on political parties, so as to produce good governance (good governance) that is stable, effective and efficient. Based on the research results, it can be seen that there is a parliamentary threshold debate in the political system in the country regarding the threshold for national vote acquisition for political parties to be included in the calculation and distribution of DPR seats. In formal juridical terms, the parliamentary threshold debate in the party system in Indonesia is conducted based on the law on political parties and democratic principles. The application of the parliamentary threshold in the national political system is expected to be simplified. Simplifying the number of political parties in Indonesia needs to be done as an effort to improve the quality of political parties so that they can make better contributions to the development of national politics. In addition, party simplification is also carried out in order to facilitate political governance in parliament and to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of democratic and political processes both in parliament and in government. Therefore, simplifying the party is an alternative solution in improving the quality of democracy and government stability, which in the end is for the welfare of the people

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BUKU-BUKU;
Amiruddin dan Zainal Askin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Edisi I- 5 2010, Jakarta.
Bagir Manan, “Jabatan KePresidenan Republik Indonesia” dalam 70 Tahun Prof. Dr. Harun Alrasid (intergritas, konsistensi seorang sarjana hukum), editor.A.Muhammad Asrun dan Hendra Nurtjahjo, Pusata Studi HTN UI, 2000, Jakarta.
Charles Simamura, Parlemen Di Indonesia Lintas Sejarah dan Sistemnya, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Cetakann Ke-1 Agustus 2011, Jakarta.
Conie Pania Putri. Pola Ideal Sistem Pemilihan Umum Yang Demokratis(Studi Komparatif Sistem Pemilihan Umum di Australia dan Indonesia. Jurnal Thengkyang : Vol 2 No 1 Desember (2019) hal 91-105
Hetifah SJ Sumarto, Inovasi Partisipasf Dan Goog Governance 20 Prakarsa Inovatif Dan Partisipatiff Di Indonesia, Yayasan obor Indonesia IKAPI DKI Jakarta, Edisi kedua Januari 2004, Jakarta.
Jhonny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia, Malang.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Menuju Negara yang Demokratis, Sekretaris Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008, Jakarta, Hlm
Jimly Asshiddiqie. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Bhuana Ilmu Populer 2007, Jakarta.
Khairul Fahmi, Pemilihan umum & kedaulatan Rakyat, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Cetakan Ke 1 Agustus 2011, Jakarta.
Muhammad Ali Safa’at, Parlemen Bikameral studi perbandingan di amerika serikat, perancis, selandia baru, inggris, Austria, dan Indonesia. Universitas Brawijaya Press. Cetakan Pertama, Juni 2010, Malang.
Miftah Thoha, Birokrasi & Politik di Indonesia, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007, Jakarta,
M. Rusli Karim, Perjalanan Partai Politik di Indonesia Sebuah Potret Pasang Surut, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Cetakan Ketiga Januari 1993, Jakarta.
Sukarna, Sistem Politik Indoensia, Mandar maju, Cetakan I 1990, Bandung.
Soedarsono. Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilu 2004 Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MKRI. Cetakan Kedua Juli 2006, Jakarta Pusat.
Titik Triwulan Tutik, Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Negara, Prestasi Pustaka, 2006 Jakarta.
Zulkifly Hamid, Pengantar Ilmu Politik, Diterjemahkan dari buku aslinya, Carlton Clymer Rodee (et-al), Introduction To Political Science, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Ed. 1-8 2009, Jakarta.
INTERNET;
Dikutip dalam http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koalisi, di akses tanggal 21 april 2020
Dikutip dalam http://hukum.kompasiana.com/2011/02/22/mimpi-efektifitas-dengan-perubahan-peraturan-partai-politik/, di akses tanggal 28 februari 2020
Dikutip dalam http://www.inoputro.com/2011/07/demokrasi-konstitusional-abad-ke-20-rule-of-law-yang-dinamis/, di akses tanggal 20 februari 2020


PUTUSAN;
Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia No 3/PUU-VII/2009 Perihal UU No. 10 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum Anggota DPR, DPD, dan DPRD terhadap UUD 1945.


UNDANG-UNDANG;
Lihat; Undang-Undang No 02 Tahun 2008 jo Undang-undang Nomor 02 Tahun 2011 Tentang Partai Politik.
Lihat; Undang-undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah.
Undang-undang Pemilihan umum tahun 2008 jo Undang undang No. 8 Tahun 2012 tentang pemilihan umum Jo Undang-Undang 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum
Published
2020-12-01
How to Cite
Adiwira, O. (2020). IMPLIKASI PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD TERHADAP SISTEM KEPARTAIAN DI INDONESIA. SOL JUSTICIA, 3(2), 227-248. Retrieved from http://ojs.ukb.ac.id/index.php/sj/article/view/200
Section
Articles