SOL JUSTICIA

Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Relasi Muslim dan Non-Muslim dalam Kehidupan Bernegara: Reinterpretasi Konsep Ahl al-Dzimmah dalam Perspektif Kewarganegaraan Modern

Fenita Lara Bheta, Sutrisno Hadi — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 04:22:04 +0000

The relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims in state life is an important issue in Islamic thought studies, particularly regarding the concepts of majority–minority relations and ahl al-dhimmah. This study aims to analyze the interpretation of Qur’anic verses concerning Muslim and non-Muslim relations and their relevance in the context of the modern state. The research employed a qualitative approach with a library research method. Data were obtained through the study of Qur’anic verses, classical and contemporary tafsir literature, Islamic thought references, and other relevant academic sources. The analysis was conducted using a thematic interpretation (maudhu’i) approach to comprehensively understand the concepts of majority–minority relations and ahl al-dhimmah. The findings indicate that contextual interpretations of Qur’anic verses are more relevant in fostering tolerant, just, and inclusive relationships between Muslims and non-Muslims within state life. In addition, the concept of ahl al-dhimmah is understood as a historical construct that needs reinterpretation in accordance with the principles of modern citizenship, which emphasize equality of rights and obligations among citizens. This study highlights the importance of integrating text, context, and social dynamics in building harmonious and equitable majority–minority relations in modern states.

Runtuhnya Kekhalifahan Utsmaniyah dan Rekonstruksi Identitas Islam di Era Modern : Kajian Historis-Intelektual

Zulfi Fuadiyah, Farcha Faiza Aulia, Khairunnisa Khairunnisa — Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:19:35 +0000

The collapse of the Ottoman Caliphate and the dynamics of the reconstruction of Islamic identity in the modern era. The study begins with a conceptual explanation of the caliphate from an Islamic perspective, covering the theological foundations, leadership functions, and its relevance in the socio-political life of the people. The historical journey of the Ottoman Empire from its founding at the end of the 13th century, its golden age under Sultan Muhammad Al-Fatih and Sultan Sulaiman al-Qanuni, until its decline due to internal and external factors such as a weak government system, corruption, pressure from nationalism, and advances in Western military technology. It also examines the role of Ottoman intellectual figures, such as Ibrahim Sinasi, Ziya Pasha, Namık Kemal, and Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, who influenced the direction of reform and modern political thought in Turkey. Through historical and descriptive analysis, it shows that the collapse of the Ottoman Empire was not only a turning point for Islamic world politics, but also gave birth to new discourses on identity, modernity, and the relationship between religion and the state in the context of contemporary Islamic civilization.

Digitalisasi Peradilan di Indonesia: Antara Efisiensi Prosedural dan Tantangan Keadilan Substantif

Aloysius Wisnubroto — Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:10:20 +0000

The digitalization of the judiciary in Indonesia is a consequence of the development of information technology, which has encouraged the transformation of the judicial system toward a more modern, faster, more transparent, and more efficient process. However, digitalization not only offers procedural convenience but also raises fundamental issues concerning the ability of the digital judicial system to preserve the values of substantive justice. This study aims to analyze the digitalization of the judiciary in Indonesia in relation to procedural efficiency and the challenges of achieving substantive justice. The method used is normative legal research with conceptual and philosophical approaches through doctrinal analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and relevant literature. The findings show that judicial digitalization can improve case administration efficiency, accelerate case handling, reduce bureaucratic obstacles, and expand public access to judicial information. Nevertheless, the application of digital technology may also create several problems, such as reduced direct interaction between judges and parties, limited understanding of the social context of cases, unequal access to technology, and the risk of shifting the orientation of the judiciary from the pursuit of justice to merely accelerating procedures. This condition indicates a tension between the demand for procedural efficiency and the preservation of substantive justice values. This article contributes by offering a framework that judicial digitalization should be positioned as an instrument to support justice, not as a substitute for humane, contextual, and rights-oriented legal reasoning. Therefore, judicial digitalization in Indonesia must be directed toward a balance between the use of technology, equal access guarantees, and the protection of the fundamental principles of fair trial

Pemanggilan Tanpa Status oleh Penyidik dan Implikasinya terhadap Perlindungan Hak Individu dalam KUHAP Baru

Vincentius Patria Setyawan — Thu, 25 Jun 2026 01:27:51 +0000

Practical summons without the determination of legal status by investigators during the investigative examination stage raises issues within Indonesian criminal procedural law. This is reflected in Article 22 paragraph (1) of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, which grants investigators the authority, for the purpose of investigation, to summon or approach a person to obtain information without first determining their legal status as a witness or a suspect. This provision has the potential to create legal uncertainty and affect the protection of human rights in the criminal justice process. This research aims to analyze the implications of such summons practices on the protection of human rights and their conformity with the principle of due process of law. The method used is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings show that Article 22 paragraph (1) contains normative ambiguity because it does not provide clear procedural boundaries regarding the purpose of summons, duration of examination, the right to legal counsel, and the legal consequences of statements obtained from individuals who have not been assigned a legal status. This lack of clarity opens wide discretion for investigators, which may weaken the protection of procedural rights of individuals during the investigation process. Therefore, clearer regulation regarding the legal status of subjects under examination from the outset of investigative actions is required to ensure legal certainty, protection of human rights, and the principle of fair trial

Keabsahan Klausula Baku dan Pilihan Forum Asing Marketplace bagi Perlindungan Konsumen

Ferroka Putra Wathan — Thu, 25 Jun 2026 01:29:19 +0000

On online marketplaces, consumer contracts are not negotiated but imposed as standard-form clauses on a take-it-or-leave-it basis, producing extreme bargaining asymmetry. Exoneration clauses, unilateral amendment clauses, and choice-of-law and choice-of-forum clauses designating foreign jurisdictions frequently shelter behind freedom of contract and party autonomy, which are not absolute. This article tests the validity of such clauses against the prohibition of standard clauses under consumer protection law, the principles of contract law, and the limitation of autonomy through public order (ordre public) and mandatory rules in private international law, and then formulates a prospective arrangement. The method is normative-doctrinal, using statutory, conceptual, case, and limited comparative approaches; Indonesian law is the primary object, while the European Union regime and the doctrine of unconscionability serve as functional mirrors. The testing yields a graded diagnostic: exoneration clauses are null and void and a foreign forum is set aside for stripping access to justice, whereas foreign choice of law is confined to the mandatory protective core. A limited status for amendment with reasonable notice and for proportionate limitation of liability is offered as the author's construction, while the operator's qualification as an active business actor defeats the mere-conduit defense. The central finding is that reactive civil nullity proves illusory, so protection requires a hybrid architecture combining nullity with proportionate administrative supervision bound by the principle of legality, through pre-approval of clauses before publication. The contribution is doctrinal-constructive with epistemic humility: the parameters are normative and deliberately designed to be testable against future jurisprudence.

Meningkatkan Kesadaran Hukum Dan Moral Warga Binaan Terhadap Bahaya Dan Sanksi Hukum Judi Online Di Lapas Kelas I A Merah Mata Kota Palembang Provinsi Sumatera Selatan

Muh. Nasir — Mon, 29 Jun 2026 04:02:06 +0000

Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi telah mendorong munculnya berbagai bentuk kejahatan digital, salah satunya judi online yang berdampak negatif terhadap aspek ekonomi, sosial, psikologis, dan moral masyarakat. Fenomena ini juga menjadi perhatian dalam sistem pemasyarakatan karena pentingnya pembinaan warga binaan agar memiliki kesadaran hukum dan moral sebagai bekal kembali ke masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tingkat kesadaran hukum dan moral warga binaan terhadap bahaya judi online, mengkaji upaya pembinaan yang dilakukan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas I A Merah Mata Kota Palembang, serta mengidentifikasi faktor pendukung dan penghambat pelaksanaannya. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum empiris dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan, observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesadaran hukum dan moral warga binaan meningkat melalui program pembinaan yang meliputi penyuluhan hukum, pembinaan keagamaan, pendidikan karakter, konseling psikologis, pembinaan mental dan spiritual, serta pelatihan keterampilan kerja. Faktor pendukung meliputi program pembinaan yang terstruktur, dukungan petugas, kerja sama dengan berbagai pihak, pembinaan keagamaan, dan motivasi warga binaan untuk berubah. Adapun faktor penghambat meliputi rendahnya tingkat pendidikan, pengaruh lingkungan sosial, kecanduan judi online, perkembangan teknologi informasi, keterbatasan sarana dan prasarana, serta kondisi overkapasitas lembaga pemasyarakatan

Analisis Unsur “Pemerintahan yang Berdaulat” dalam Konvensi Montevideo 1933 Terhadap Krisis Pemerintahan di Venezuela

Vicky Prayitno S, Yoldi Olpi Foenale, Saidil Adri — Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis unsur pemerintahan yang berdaulat (government) dalam Konvensi Montevideo Tahun 1933 terhadap krisis pemerintahan di Venezuela serta mengkaji implikasi hukum internasional dari legitimasi pemerintahan dan prinsip non-intervensi dalam situasi krisis politik suatu negara. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus yang dianalisis secara yuridis kualitatif melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa krisis politik dan tekanan internasional yang dialami Venezuela tidak serta-merta menghilangkan unsur pemerintahan yang berdaulat sebagaimana diatur dalam Konvensi Montevideo 1933. Unsur government dalam hukum internasional lebih ditentukan oleh efektivitas pelaksanaan fungsi-fungsi kenegaraan dibandingkan pengakuan politik dari negara lain. Venezuela masih memenuhi unsur pemerintahan secara de facto karena tetap menjalankan administrasi negara, mengendalikan wilayah, serta memiliki kapasitas untuk melaksanakan hubungan internasional. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa prinsip non-intervensi tetap menjadi landasan penting dalam menilai tindakan negara lain terhadap pemerintahan suatu negara yang sedang mengalami krisis. Kontribusi penelitian ini terletak pada penegasan bahwa efektivitas pemerintahan merupakan parameter utama dalam menilai terpenuhinya unsur pemerintahan yang berdaulat dalam Konvensi Montevideo 1933 pada situasi krisis pemerintahan kontemporer.

Perlindungan Viktimologis Terhadap Perempuan Korban Ingkar Janji Nikah Adat dalam Perspektif Pasal 412 KUHP Nasional

Yoldi Foenale Submit, Iber Dedy Kornel Tanesib — Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi yuridis pengaturan delik kohabitasi dalam Pasal 412 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Nasional terhadap perempuan korban ingkar janji nikah adat serta merumuskan model perlindungan hukum yang berbasis perspektif viktimologi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Pasal 412 KUHP Nasional yang menafsirkan unsur "perkawinan yang sah" secara administratif-formal berpotensi menimbulkan disharmoni normatif dengan pengakuan konstitusional terhadap masyarakat hukum adat dan menciptakan kerentanan hukum bagi perempuan yang telah melangsungkan perkawinan menurut adat dan agama, tetapi belum tercatat secara administratif. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa perempuan korban ingkar janji nikah adat tidak dapat serta-merta diposisikan sebagai pelaku delik kohabitasi tanpa mempertimbangkan unsur delik, pengakuan terhadap living law, serta posisi korban dalam perspektif viktimologi. Sebagai kontribusi teoritis, penelitian ini menawarkan Model Perlindungan Viktimologis Substantif yang meliputi penafsiran substantif terhadap unsur "perkawinan yang sah", penerapan prinsip pre-judicial question, pendekatan restorative justice, serta pengakuan terhadap living law dalam penerapan Pasal 412 KUHP Nasional. Model tersebut diharapkan dapat menjadi pedoman bagi aparat penegak hukum dalam mewujudkan perlindungan hukum yang lebih berkeadilan bagi perempuan korban ingkar janji nikah adat

Legal Politics Reaktualisasi Politik Hukum Penanaman Modal Berbasis Prinsip Kesejahteraan Sosial

Arif Rochman, Husni Tamrin — Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000

This scientific journal attempts to discuss the legal politics of drafting investment policy in Indonesia, which urgently needs to be reconstructed (reorganized), considering that the pattern of foreign investment policy-making for approximately 67 years still uses a 'top-down' model, namely all policies/instructions from above (the Government of the Republic of Indonesia), in the form of Presidential Regulations and Decrees of the Minister of Investment and Regulations of the Investment Coordinating Board of the Republic of Indonesia, are issued and then passed down to be implemented by the lower-class local entrepreneurial/business community, namely MSMEs-K, without the slightest involvement of domestic investment stakeholders (Apindo/Kadin, etc.). This juridical empiric research was conducted in the working area of the Central Java Provincial Investment Office, as well as the Ministry of Investment/BKPB in Jakarta. Using a qualitative data analysis model, and an empirical juridical research type. The Indonesian government needs to take action in the form of reconstructing the legal politics of foreign investment in Indonesia, by prioritizing welfare theories/concepts that are more characterized by distributive-substantive welfare, rather than procedural/formality welfare models. In the concept of distributive-substantive welfare, portions of the non-renewable natural resource business sector, as well as portions of joint venture/enterprise share ownership, as well as portions of tax relief and other fiscal relief policies, must also be provided to domestic investors, particularly MSMEs- K.