Kajian Sistematis Integrasi Optik Lokal Yogyakarta dengan E-Commerce Tokopedia dan Shopee

Sri Wahyu Budoyo Kusumo; Ardhitya Furqon Wicaksono; Arraywed Yudita Wibowo

doi:10.54816/jmabis.v4i1.950

Sri Wahyu Budoyo Kusumo Akademi Optometri Yogyakarta
Ardhitya Furqon Wicaksono Akademi Optometri Yogyakarta
Arraywed Yudita Wibowo Akademi Optometri Yogyakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54816/jmabis.v4i1.950

Abstract

Digital transformation driven by the development of information technology has affected various sectors, including the optical business. In Yogyakarta, a city with rapid growth of optical MSMEs, the utilization of e-commerce platforms such as Tokopedia and Shopee is still not optimal. In fact, the adoption of marketplaces has the potential to expand market reach and increase competitiveness. This study aims to examine the readiness and challenges of adopting digital technology in local optical businesses through the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach with the PRISMA protocol. A total of 25 relevant articles were selected from the Google Scholar, Garuda, DOAJ, and Scopus databases based on the inclusion criteria: publications in 2018–2024 and focusing on the digitalization of health MSMEs, e-commerce, and optical business practices in Indonesia, especially the Yogyakarta region. The results of the study showed that 87% of the literature supports the benefits of e-commerce integration for market expansion and improving customer experience. However, only around 12% of local opticians have implemented digital strategies optimally, especially in utilizing marketplace features such as chatbots, stock integration, and Official Stores. The main challenges include limited digital literacy of the workforce, inefficient logistics, and unsynchronized online health service regulations. This study concludes that structural readiness and increasing digital competence are the main prerequisites in optimizing the transformation of the optical business through e-commerce. As a recommendation, digital literacy training, marketplace integration workshops, and support for incentive policies from local governments are essential. This study also offers a conceptual model of three pillars of integration: digital products, marketplace interactions, and online-offline service synchronization as the basis for a post-pandemic local optical digitalization strategy.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. Norton & Company.

Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019). Digital Marketing (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Fauziah, L., Santoso, A., & Widodo, T. (2023). Persepsi Pelanggan terhadap Pelayanan Optik Digital. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 9(4), 110–123.

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele University and University of Durham.

Kusuma, R. (2022). Strategi Omnichannel dalam Peningkatan Loyalitas Konsumen Sektor Kesehatan. Jurnal Pemasaran Digital Indonesia, 5(1), 22–34.

Laudon, K. C., & Traver, C. G. (2021). E-commerce: Business, Technology, Society. Pearson Education.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Novianto, A. (2021). Pemanfaatan Shopee dan Tokopedia oleh Pelaku Usaha Optik di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Niaga Kesehatan, 4(3), 90–102.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing.

Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., ... & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme.

Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Companies. Harvard Business Review, 93(10), 96–114.

Prasetyo, Y. T., & Haryanto, J. O. (2023). Digitalisasi Bisnis Optik: Tantangan dan Peluang. Jurnal Teknologi Bisnis Kesehatan, 6(1), 45–60.

Setiadi, R., Mulyani, S., & Rachman, D. (2022). Adopsi Marketplace oleh UMKM Kesehatan di DIY. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Digital, 7(2), 133–145.

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Taufiq, M., & Siregar, A. (2023). Peluang dan Tantangan Integrasi Optik dengan Marketplace. Jurnal Manajemen UMKM,

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

Wijaya, I.G. et al. (2020). Marketplace as a Catalyst for Health Retail Business. International Journal of e-Business Research, Scopus.