PENERAPAN MODEL ALTERNATIF PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SEBAGAI JALAN PEMULIHAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA
Abstract
The current perspective on eradicating corruption still prioritizes corporal punishment or imprisonment for perpetrators of corruption instead of using the perspective of returning state finances, this perspective is based on the view of retributive justice theory which is the legal basis for eradicating corruption, the theory of retributive justice is irrelevant to the main goal of corruption eradication law in Indonesia which was built with the spirit of recovering state financial losses, this is far more important than prioritizing imprisonment for perpetrators of corruption, namely the recovery of state financial losses. justice to maximize state financial returns in criminalizing corruptors in Indonesia through asset confiscation using both criminal and civil channels. By using normative juridical research methods. This study concludes that the concept of restorative justice in sentencing perpetrators of corruption can be implemented in the form of strengthening norms for recovering state losses without prejudice to the deprivation of independence of perpetrators which aims to provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators of corruption crimes and confiscating assets against perpetrators of corruption both through criminal and civil channels
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku:
A.Fuad usfa dan Tongat, 2004, Pengantar Hukum Pidana, Cetakan kedua, Penerbit Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang,
Erdianto Effendi, 2011, Hukum Pidana Indonesia – suatu pengantar, Cetakan Kesatu, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung,
Jonny Ibrahim, 2006, Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang: Bayumedia,
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, 1984,Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Pidana¸ Alumni, Bandung
Jurnal:
Artidjo Alkostar, Kerugian Keuangan Negara dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi,Varia Peradilan No. 275 Oktober 2008, 34-35
Arief, M. O. H. Z. (2015). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Penghambat Laju Ekonomi. Jurnal Jendela Hukum, 2(2), 23–27.
Aleksandar Fatic, Punishment and Restorative Crime – Handling. (USA: Avebury Ashagate Publishing Limited, 1995),
Budi Suharianto, Restorative Justice dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupsi demi Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara, Jakarta, Kemenkumham, Volume 5, Nomor 3, Desember 2016, hlm. 423
Bernadeta Maria Erna,Peranan Jaksa dalam Pengembalian Aset Negara, Seminar Nasional Optimalisasi Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam pengembalian Aset hasil Korupsi melalui Instrumen Hukum Perdata, Paguyuban Pasundan, FH Universitas Pasundan, Bandung 26 Oktober 2013, 2.
Kant dan Hegel dalam Jan Remmelink, Hukum Pidana, Komentar atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari KUHP Belanda dan Padanannya dalam KUHP Indonesia, (Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1993), hlm. 600
Tonny F. Marshall dalam buku Marlina (2) , Pengantar Konsep Diversi dan Restoratif Justice dalam Hukum Pidana, 2010, USU Press,Medan, hlm. 28
Muhammad Yusuf, Merampas Aset Koruptor (Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia), Kompas, Jakarta, 2013, 161-162
Kutipan Website:
https://badiklat.kejaksaan.go.id/artikel/detail/781 diakses pada 24 november 2022 pukul 09.30 WIB